In the year 1600 it is estimated that somewhere between 60 to 80 million buffalo were in America, millions more in Canada, our neighbor to the north. In addition, there were tens of millions of deer, elk, mountain goats and bighorn sheep. All these animals ate grass and were indeed as flatulent as todays domestic cattle. Forest and grass range fires, started by lightning, burned unchecked for weeks or even months, spewing pollutants into the atmosphere. Measurement of tree rings from trees over a thousand years old show that there were long periods of drought hundreds of years before the first European set foot on the Americas.
One group of people who lived here at the time were dramatically affected by “Climate Change”. They were the “Anasazi” of the American Southwest. The word “Anasazi” is a Navajo word, meaning “ancient one” or “enemy ancestor”. They arrived in the area as early as 1500 BC and flourished between 200 and 1500 AD. They are generally thought to be the direct ancestors of the Pueblo tribes, who today form a large portion of the American Indian tribes living in Arizona, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico, including the Hopi and the Zuni. Sometime in the mid 1200s these people, who had formerly lived on the tops of mesas or in the valleys below, tending their crops of corn and squash, were forced to build the “Cliff Dwellings” which dot the desert southwest today. This dangerous decision must have been caused by the necessity to defend themselves from unknown enemies who had appeared on the scene. Were they the ancestors of the present day Navajo? The derivation of “Anasazi” would seem to indicate that is so. Before the first Spaniard set foot in the region, they had completely disappeared. Continue reading Starve in the Dark?
I will never forget a statement made by an Air Force Major to his ROTC class. “Anyone can demand respect.” He said. “But only a true leader can command respect”. As I look at the current political landscape from the viewpoint of a child of the “Greatest Generation”, I find very few individuals on either side of the political aisle in Washington who typify the latter. I can name none in the Democratic Party who do.
As the push for stricter gun control by virtually all of the Democratic presidential candidates continues, the very important issue which isn’t part of the discussion is so-called “Gun Free Zones”, and the very real threat they pose to everyone in this country. I have written on this subject before. I can find no possible reason to allow any venue to arbitrarily declare that it is “Gun Free”, and thereby lull individuals into a false sense of security while there. Whether is is a school, restaurant, retail store or entertainment venue, unless there is a mechanism in place to properly scan people for weapons prior to entering, the concept of a location being “Gun Free” is ridiculous on its face.